How comparison sites decide · A healthier enquiry pipeline · The local citations check
Get the facts to agree, and business data providers will do the rest without being asked.
A citation is any place on the web where the list of services appears for {entity_s}. Listing audits repeatedly show the gap between a neat profile and a neglected one widens in a tightly defined neighbourhood.
Unlike content, citations don't need to be original, they need to be identical.
A profile can look perfect on the surface and still carry an abandoned profile underneath. Strip away the jargon and syndicated listings are simply repeated, checkable facts.
Record the canonical version of the logo and imagery somewhere the office manager can find it.
A workable routine is to prune whenever contact details change and log every change with a date.
Handle the high-authority sources by hand and batch the long tail afterwards.
Anything unverifiable should be removed rather than corrected.
The data from most clean-up projects indicates the majority of profiles carry at least one contradiction. Give one person the logins and one document the truth; ambiguity is what causes drift. Almost always, online mentions are less a marketing channel than a data layer under one.
| Field | What to check | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Local search signals audit | Treat the core contact record as a single source of truth, not as a field to be improvised per site. | before each campaign |
| Checking the logo and imagery | Check what a competitor in a competitive suburb has claimed before deciding where to submit. | each quarter |
| The local business records check | If a listing can't be claimed, document it and move on rather than duplicating it. | as part of the monthly reporting cycle |
| Toward a wider organic footprint | Keep the description factual; the categories carry the relevance work. | at least annually |
Further reading